"Unravelling the Enigma: Curbing Nuclear Power and Decapitating the Supreme Leader to Silence the Vision of a Palestinian State."

Dr Pamelia Riviere

Unravelling the complex strategy of US and Israeli aggression against Iran: aimed at diminishing Tehran’s nuclear aspirations and strategically targeting the decapitation of the supreme leader, along with high-ranking officials in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), to suppress aspirations for a Palestinian state.

Netanyahu, alongside operatives from Mossad and the CIA, believed that without the influence of Iran's theocratic regime and its nuclear ambitions, the call for a Palestinian state would fade away. They imagined that the dream of Palestine could be effectively stifled by targeting the nation’s top leaders. In their view, removing these figures would weaken the resolve for statehood and diminish aspirations for a Palestinian future.

Without the powerful influence of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei and the guiding hand of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the dream of a Palestinian state would likely remain elusive. The aspirations of the Israeli leader were thwarted by the daunting presence of the Iranian military, transforming a distant ideal into a complex reality. Unfortunately, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's proposal to US President Donald Trump for a streamlined solution did not yield the results expected by Netanyahu, the CIA, and Mossad.

Deep Throat: Balkanized Iran means, No Palestine State! 

The concept of a Balkanized Iran paints a picture of a future where influential groups like Hezbollah and Hamas, as well as the notion of a Palestinian state, no longer hold sway. For Israel, this scenario presents a tantalizing prospect: the potential realization of a Greater Israel that could reshape the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East. This shift could imply not only a reconfiguration of borders but also a dramatic change in regional power dynamics, creating new opportunities and challenges for Israel's security and strategic interests.

This article delves into the intricate and often classified discussions surrounding the strategic war plan concerning Iran, brought to light by former CIA operatives, esteemed political scientists, and distinguished journalists. The focus is on the comprehensive insights gathered about the underlying motivations and objectives of this plan, particularly those associated with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. Central to this strategy is Netanyahu's ambitious goal of dismantling Iran's leadership structure by assassinating key figures. This includes not only the highest-ranking theological leaders but also the senior commanders of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and prominent nuclear scientists, including those involved in diplomatic engagements aimed at peace negotiations.

 The rationale behind these actions is to eliminate Iran's capacity to exert pressure on Israel through its regional proxy forces, Hezbollah and Hamas, which are pivotal in the broader context of the Palestinian struggle for independence. Envision a scenario where Iran’s aspirations for nuclear power are thwarted and the oppressive framework of its theocratic regime dissipates. 

A military intervention by the United States and Israel could potentially signify the end of a century-long pursuit for Palestinian sovereignty. This critically important moment would not only alter the geopolitical landscape but also reshape the future for countless individuals seeking a state of their own. The implications of such a shift are monumental, suggesting a transformative shift in the dynamics of the Middle East.

Netanyahu’s survival agenda: No Palestine

The tragic situation in Gaza has been exacerbated by severe violence, including acts of genocide, as well as the targeted assassination of key leaders from Hezbollah, Hamas, and Iran. These brutal tactics have been employed strategically to thwart any efforts towards establishing a viable Palestinian state by Netanyahu. Despite receiving significant backing from various sources, including past and present U.S. presidents, the influential IPAC lobby, evangelical Christian groups, and prominent Zionist congressional leaders, the vision of a Greater Israel ultimately unravelled, which made Netanyahu frantic. 

Did Trump entangle himself with Netanyahu’s Survival plan?

What motivated Donald Trump to launch an offensive against Iran? These questions arise in light of the broader geopolitical chess game involving Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, and the influence of the Israel Project and Advocacy Coalition (IPAC). It seems to revolve not just around Trump's political survival in the looming election but also around the precarious position of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in his own political landscape. 

Recent investigative journalism has brought to light a complex web of motivations behind these actions. Central to Netanyahu's strategy is a steadfast commitment to preventing the establishment of a Palestinian state. This avoidance is not merely an ideological stance; it is a calculated move to safeguard his political future in Israel and to evade various legal challenges, including impending arrest warrants stemming from corruption allegations. By ensuring that the prospect of Palestinian statehood remains out of reach, Netanyahu wields this issue as a crucial tool—his "magic stick"—to maintain his grip on power. 

This approach is seen as vital to his political longevity, as it deflects attention from his legal troubles and reinforces his standing among certain voter blocs opposed to Palestinian statehood. In this intricate dance of diplomacy and domestic politics, the notion of "no Palestine" emerges as a pivotal strategy for Netanyahu's political survival.

Shifted the voices of new generations in America

A recent survey published by Quinnipiac University, reported by the Times of Israel and JTA, reveals a significant shift in American public opinion regarding U.S. support for Israel. According to the findings, an alarming 48% of American voters now believe that the United States provides "too much support" to Israel, marking the highest level of dissent recorded since the pollster began asking this question in 2017. The survey, released on Wednesday, also uncovered that a notable 60% of respondents deem military intervention in Iran as "not worth it," contrasting sharply with the 34% who believe it is justified. When asked about the adequacy of U.S. support for Israel, only 38% of participants feel it is just right, while a mere 7% assert that the U.S. is not supportive enough. Delving deeper into the data reveals stark partisan divides. 

Among Democrats, a striking 66% express the view that the U.S. is too supportive of Israel; only 9% think the support is insufficient, while 18% believe it is adequate. Conversely, Republican respondents exhibit a different perspective: 20% feel the U.S. is excessively supportive, with a significant 69% asserting that the support aligns well with their expectations, and only 6% feeling it is lacking. This shift in opinion comes against the backdrop of escalating violence in Gaza and recent Israeli military operations targeting Iran, which have added complexity to the narrative. 

Events surrounding these conflicts have sparked broader discussions about U.S. foreign policy, particularly under the administration of  President Donald Trump, who had initially expressed reluctance to engage in war prior to the election. 

Notably, Vice President Vance stated that Israel's actions could be seen as provocations for U.S. involvement in the conflict. Reports indicate that Israeli intelligence agencies, such as Mossad, played a critical role, providing information that suggested a decisive victory through targeted operations aimed at top Iranian leaders and advocating for regime change. These developments reflect a broader trend identified by organizations such as Gallup and the Pew Research Center, which have documented a sustained decline in American favourability towards both Israel and its Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. 

As public sentiment continues to evolve, it remains to be seen how these factors will affect U.S.-Israel relations and American foreign policy.

prompted Trump and Netanyahu to attack Iran?

Was it for Trump’s survival in the next election, or Netanyahu’s own survival in politics? 

The deep secret about attacks in Iran has been revealed by journalists and analysts. The dream of a sovereign Palestinian state has ultimately crumbled under relentless opposition from Israel and the US at the UN. Trump unabashedly denied the Palestinians' right to self-determination and to a Palestinian state. 

The moral paradox surrounding America's support of Israel is striking, particularly in light of its historical commitment to standing against genocide, as seen during the Holocaust. This ethical dilemma deepens when considering the current situation in Gaza, where the United States, under the influence of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, appears to have compromised its values. 

The U.S. has seemingly accepted the devastating military actions against Gaza and its ally, Iran, effectively contributing to a humanitarian crisis. Iran, often portrayed as the sole backer of the Palestinian cause, has continued to resist Israeli dominance in the region. While Netanyahu has pursued an aggressive policy of territorial expansion, including in Gaza, the West Bank, the Golan Heights in Syria, and southern Lebanon, the United States has provided crucial support through financial aid, military intelligence, and weaponry.

 This ambitious agenda, aimed at establishing what Netanyahu envisions as a "Greater Israel," casts a shadow on the moral fabric of the modern world. The youth of today have been witnesses to the horrors of this ongoing genocide, often broadcast live on social media for the last three years, igniting protests across the globe.

 Yet, these passionate displays of dissent have struggled to effect meaningful change. With each passing day, it seems increasingly likely that the focus will shift towards Iran, the pivotal nation that continues to back Gaza, as ripe for destabilization. 

Despite the fact that no U.S. president has fully embraced Netanyahu's vision, it was Donald Trump who appeared to succumb to his malevolent plans, seeking to attack Iran twice while dismissing the Palestinian struggle for self-determination and statehood. Initially, Trump adopted an aggressive stance but soon retreated upon realizing the limitations of American military power in confronting Iran, despite attempts by the CIA and Mossad to undermine the Islamic Republic through covert and overt operations and the assassination of key officials. 

The justification for any U.S. military action against Iran hinged on accusations of non-compliance regarding nuclear development. However, the underlying intent was to pacify Netanyahu and prevent any international initiatives that could lead to the establishment of a Palestinian state. 

What could have been a straightforward approach to effecting regime change in Iran—a strategy built on propaganda and fostering public dissent against the clerical leadership—has evolved into a secretive and troubling plan, the death of Palestine. 

Political analysts believe the underlying motivation for the attack on Iran was to curb the country's nuclear ambitions and eliminate its Supreme Leader, a strategic move intended to quell the discourse surrounding the establishment of a Palestinian state. This operation sought to weaken Iran's influence in the region by dismantling its nuclear capabilities, which many perceive as a direct threat to stability. Furthermore, by targeting the Supreme Leader, the intention was to disrupt the leadership structure that has long championed the Palestinian cause, thereby silencing calls for a recognized and sovereign Palestinian state. This multifaceted strategy reflects broader geopolitical interests and the desire to reshape power dynamics in the Middle East.

This clandestine operation, which I dubbed "Deep Throat," was a classified case characterized by a systematic campaign involving the assassination of high-profile leaders, including nuclear scientists, and the destruction of critical infrastructure, all while remaining largely hidden from the global community. The ramifications of this strategy could be profoundly damaging, not just for Iran or Palestine but for the entire region and Israel at large. 

The writer is a freelance analyst.